SPOUSES FRANKLIN AND LOURDES OLBES VS. ATTY VICTOR V DECIEMBRE (April 27,2005)




FACTS:
            Complainants were government employees. Through respondent, Lourdes renewed a loan application from Rodela Loans Inc., in the amount of P10,000.00. She issued and delivered 5 PNB blank checks, which served as collateral for the approved loan as well as for the future loans. Lourdes paid respondent P14,874.37 intended to the loan plus surcharges, penalties, and interests, for which the latter issued a receipt. Notwithstanding the full payment of the loan, respondent filled up the blank checks entrusted to him by writing on those checks amounts that had not been agreed upon at all and deposited the same checks which were dishonored upon presentment because the account is already closed. Thereafter, he filed a criminal case against complainants for estafa and for violation of B.P. 22. Thus, complainants filed a verified petition for the disbarment of Atty. Deciembre and charged the respondent with willful and deliberate acts of dishonesty, falsification and conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar.

ISSUE: Whether or not respondent lawyer is guilty of gross misconduct and violation of Rules 1.01 and 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

HELD: YES.

            Respondent lawyer violated  Rules 1.01 and 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility for he seriously transgressed by his malevolent act of filling up the blank checks by indicating amounts that had not been agreed upon at all and despite full knowledge that the loan supposed to be secured by the checks had already been paid. His was a brazen act of falsification of a commercial document, resorted to for his material gain. Respondent is clearly guilty of serious dishonesty and professional misconduct. He committed an act indicative of moral depravity not expected from, and highly unbecoming a member of the bar. His propensity for employing deceit and misrepresentation is reprehensible. His misuse of the filled-up checks that led to the detention of one petitioner is loathsome.

            Respondent is hereby indefinitely SUSPENDED from the practice of law.

Comments