TEODOLFO REYES vs. ATTY. ROLANDO JAVIER [A.C. No. 5574. February 1, 2002]


FACTS:

This refers to the complaint filed by Teodolfo Reyes against Atty. Rolando Javier with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines on March 17, 1999 for negligence and deceit in handling his case.

Respondent was the legal counsel of the complainant for the annulment of his marriage to his wife.  It was agreed that the petition for annulment shall be filed in March, 1998.  Sometime in April, 1998, complainant inquired from the respondent if the petition has already been filed in court.  Respondent answered in the affirmative but no copy of the petition was furnished to the complainant.  Every time the complainant asked for a copy of the petition, respondent gave him excuses, i.e., his secretary was absent; copy of the petition will just be sent to him through a friend; complainant need not worry about the case.  He was assured that the case will be over after three (3) months from its filing.  In May, 1998, complainant made another follow-up with the respondent but he was asked to wait until after the May 14 Elections as respondent was busy campaigning for a candidate then.

In a Report dated April 26, 2000, the IBP Commission on Bar Discipline found the respondent guilty of the charges filed against him by complainant.  The Commission also noted his deliberate disregard of the orders of the Commission as respondent did not file his answer to the complaint nor appeared for the hearing despite receipt of the notices.  It was recommended that Atty. Rolando Javier be suspended for a period of one year.

ISSUE: Whether or not the respondent may be suspended.


HELD: YES.

We cannot overstress the duty of a lawyer to at all times uphold the integrity and dignity of the legal profession.  He can do this by faithfully performing his duties to society, to the bar, to the courts and to his clients.

We fault respondent for deceiving his client that he has already filed the petition in the annulment case when in fact, the petition was filed on later date.  For his neglect in handling the case, he promised to return half of the amount he was paid for but never did.  Such misconduct clearly betrays the confidence reposed in him by his client.  Respondent has dismally failed to do his duty to his client and has clearly violated the Code of Professional Responsibility.  The Court can not tolerate any misconduct that tends to besmirch the fair name of an honorable profession.


WHEREFORE, respondent Atty. Rolando Javier is hereby SUSPENDED for one (1) year from the practice of law with a warning that a repetition of the same or similar act will be dealt with more severely.  He is also directed to restitute to the complainant, Teodolfo Reyes the sum of ten thousand pesos (P10,000.00) from notice, otherwise he shall remain under suspension until he paid the complainant the amount.  He shall submit to the Court proof of payment of the above-stated amount within ten (10) days from payment.

Comments